
Steven M. Shape
About
Steven Shape is a highly accomplished attorney, partner and the Chair of the Intellectual Property Practice at Omnus Law, with over four decades of experience in patent, trademark, copyright, trade secret law, and IP litigation. A Registered Patent Attorney with the USPTO, Steven has been instrumental in shaping IP strategies for clients ranging from startups to Fortune 500 companies. His expertise spans managing global IP portfolios, resolving complex intellectual property disputes, and negotiating world-wide licensing and technology transfer agreements.โฏย
Throughout his career, Steven has successfully represented clients in high-profile patent and trademark cases before U.S. federal courts, the USPTO, and international tribunals, including proceedings before the International Trade Commission, European and Japanese Patent Offices. He has a track record of achieving favorable outcomes in over 100 Federal Court, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) and Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) actions and mediations. Stevenโs ability to navigate the complexities of cutting-edge technologiesโsuch as artificial intelligence, computer software and hardware, block chain, fintech, medical devices, chemical processes, and advanced manufacturingโmakes him an invaluable partner for businesses seeking to protect and leverage their innovations.โฏย
Steven has also advised on the intellectual property aspects of mergers and acquisitions, helping companies secure, transfer, and maximize the value of their IP assets. A recognized thought leader in the field, Steven is an accomplished speaker and has published extensively on emerging IP issues, including AI-driven patent strategies and international IP enforcement. His dedication to client success, combined with his legal acumen, has earned him recognition as a trusted advisor and a leading voice in intellectual property law.โฏย
Career Highlights
- Successfully represented clients in high-stakes patent, trademark and copyright litigation before U.S. and international courts.โฏย
- Implemented global IP and licensing strategies for Fortune 500 companies and emerging startups.โฏย
- Secured favorable outcomes in numerous Federal Court, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) and Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) cases.โฏย
- Advised on IP aspects of major mergers and acquisitions in technology, pharmaceutical, and manufacturing sectors.โฏย
Associations
- American Intellectual Property Association (AIPLA)โฏย
- Intellectual Property Law Association of Chicago (IPLAC)โฏย
- International Trademark Association (INTA)โฏย
Publications
- Shape, Steven M. โDefensive Publication or Patent Application: Which Works Best?โโฏMondaq, October 19, 2022.โฏLinkโฏย
- Shape, Steven M. โUtility Patent vs. Design Patent: What Protections Do They Offer?โโฏMondaq, June 16, 2022.โฏLinkโฏย
- Shape, Steven M. โSouth Africa and Australia Tackle AI Inventorship in Patents.โโฏThe Patent Lawyer โ CTL Media, September/October 2021, pp. 7-9.โฏLinkโฏย
- Shape, Steven M. โMaking the Most of Your Patent Drawings.โโฏMondaq,โฏJuneโฏJulyโฏ9, 2021.โฏLinkย
- Shape, Steven M. โIP Law Looms Large Over U.S.-China Relations.โโฏMondaq,โฏFebruary 19, 2021.โฏLinkย
- Shape, Steven M. โRegulations and the Surge of Software Patent Applications in the U.S.โโฏMondaq,โฏSeptember 3, 2020.โฏLinkย
- Shape, Steven M. โHow AI Tools Will Change Patent Practice.โโฏMondaq,โฏJune 12, 2020.โฏLinkย
- Shape, Steven M.โฏThe IP Byte News,โฏNovember 16, 2013.ย Linkย
Representative Cases
- Dynex/Rivett Inc. v. Hampidjanโฏย
- Confidential settlement for client stoppingโฏpatentโฏinfringementโฏย
- KenallโฏManufacturingโฏCo. v. H.E. Williams, Inc.โฏย
- Patent infringement settled favorable to clientโฏย
- Ruud Lighting, Inc. v. Elcast Lighting, Inc.ย
- Copyright infringement settled favorably with payment to clientโฏย
- Mosmatic v. Westpakโฏย
- Patent infringement favorably settled with payment to clientย
- CDW v. Micro Warehouseโฏย
- Injunction entered in favor of client stopping trademark infringementโฏย
- C&F Packing Co. v. IBP, Inc.โฏย
- Injunction entered with payment to client stoppingโฏpatentโฏinfringementย
- IJR v. Coltโฏย
- Confidential settlement in favor of client and patent holderโฏย
- IJRโฏv. Sodickโฏย
- Confidential settlement in favor of client and patent holderโฏย
- IJR v. KGKโฏInternationalโฏet al.โฏย
- Patent Infringement settled favorably with payment to clientโฏย
- Cases: Linkย
Practice Areas
Admitted Jurisdictions
- Illinois
- United States Supreme Court
- United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
- United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
- United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois
- United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan
- United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York
- United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
- U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
- United States International Trade Commission
Education
- J.D., DePaul University College of Law, 1982ย
- Certificate of Study, Intellectual Property and International Law, University of Cambridge, 1981ย
- B.S., Electrical Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1979ย
Languages
- English
Work With Steven
"*" indicates required fields